Take-Two has stated its investigation into figuring out the individual or individuals who leaked Grand Theft Auto 6 footage is “quickly evolving”.
Earlier this month, a bunch often known as ‘Cyberleek’ began posting what gave the impression to be authentic gameplay clips from Grand Theft Auto 6, days earlier than its official Netflix reveal.
Re-uploads of the leak throughout social media channels racked up hundreds of thousands of views, and Take-Two stated it was issuing subpoenas petitioning Microsoft and Discord for info that might level them to the leaker. It then adopted this with subsequent subpoena requests for X and YouTube.
On the time, Discord advertising and marketing director Ryan Rigney stated that it had but to be served with the subpoena, however that it could “consider the validity and scope earlier than responding” when it did arrive.
Now, as reported by TorrentFreak, Take-Two has posted a brand new court docket submitting requesting a second subpoena to be despatched to Discord, however this time with its particulars stored personal.
The earlier subpoena request particularly named Discord servers and customers that Take-Two needed extra info on. In its newest submitting, it asks for its new request – which is concentrated on one beforehand recognized Discord person and one further person – to be filed below seal, which suggests the main points aren’t publicly accessible.
In keeping with Take-Two, that is vital as a result of if the main points have been recognized to the general public, the leaker can be made conscious of this and will make efforts to delete incriminating proof.
“Public disclosure of this info might compromise Take-Two’s ongoing investigation and even tip off the alleged infringers as to the character and progress of Take-Two’s investigation and data Take-Two has gathered in regards to the infringement,” it defined, “creating a considerable danger that the infringers will delete, destroy, or in any other case conceal proof of their infringing actions, and/or take additional steps to evade identification.”

In a separate submitting, Take-Two withdrew its earlier subpoena request for info from YouTube, which was investigating three personas seemingly tied to a leaked video.
The corporate defined that its investigation had been “evolving quickly”, and that it was now not specializing in the YouTube video and due to this fact now not wanted the subpoena.
“Take-Two’s investigation into the person(s) liable for posting infringing content material on YouTube, and elsewhere on-line, has been (and is) evolving quickly as new info turns into accessible,” Take-Two’s authorized consultant wrote.
“Take-Two has been working to supply the Court docket with the extra info requested, however as this very dynamic scenario has progressed, Take-Two has decided it now not wants the actual info requested. Thus, Take-Two respectfully withdraws its subpoena request.”
